GRE写作短期备考提分方法技巧
新GRE写作高分速成技巧介绍。想要在GRE写作考试中取得高分，不仅要具有很高的GRE写作水平，还要掌握一些新GRE写作高分速成的技巧，下面小编就和大家分享GRE写作短期备考提分方法技巧，来欣赏一下吧。
GRE写作短期备考提分方法技巧
写作备考以锻炼提纲思路为主
题海战术有两个问题：一是没有解决根本问题，二是机会成本过高。所谓机会成本，就是你花的时间过多，而这些时间本来可以用来做更有意义的事情，比如说记单词，学习语法或者看书开拓思路。设想你英文很差，但你写作很努力，在考试时又碰上了写过的题目，你的作文得了5分以上，但verbal只有300多分，人家一眼就能看出你的真实水平来。所以各位考生在打基础的同时，要把重点放在提纲也就是思路的准备上。
好文章要有自身特点不能千篇一律
一个好的主题，通常都是采用滴水映海洋，粒沙藏世界的手法。从一滴水里能看到大海的样子，从一粒沙中能展现整个世界。但是，好主题通常就是这样表达出来的。每位GRE作文考友专业背景、准备时间与英语基础各不一样，在作文中面临的问题当然也不一样：有些是语言和思想都很出色，有些是有思想但表达不出来，有些是英语好但思路打不开，一个作文小组只有几个人或者十几个人，就能够看出这些差别来，用一种统一的方法来进行准备，未必对每个人都意味着高效率。
彻底了解自身写法错误
写作能力很强的同学，通常的一件事会把握怎样写，如何写，哪些该祥，哪些该略，哪些该修饰，哪些该平白，驾驭文字的功夫很是了得。文采不是每个人天生就有的，它是一个逐步积累、逐步升华、逐步成熟的过程，需要去大量阅读、长期积累、心灵感悟、凝练提取的再创造本领，这要在日常学习中逐步提高，很多GRE作文考友干劲十足，一天一篇argument，但如果基本问题不解决而沉溺于题海战术中，往往是事倍功半。即使GRE作文考友帮助你修改得很好，但你并不能透彻了解自己语法或者思维方式错误的根源在哪里，那就只能寄希望于把每一篇改过的都背下来然后在考试时碰上。如果记得不牢或者根本没碰上，问题就大了。
选择性地练习实战写作
试想一下，如果你在考试时面对题目，最可能使你心慌的是什么?那可能就是这道题没见过，不知从哪下手;如果你想过了，即使你没写过，你也不会太紧张。
GRE写作满分范文
"In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists — people who can provide broad perspectives."
In today's society, there are many people who feel generalist are more broad than specialists. I will discuss how there is a need for generalists in the medical field, education, and the work place. First, I will discuss how there is a need for generalists in the medical field. A generalist in this area would be straight foward with clients. For instance, in explaining to a patient they had cancer. A specialist would use wording that you would believe everything is fine.
Second, I will discuss how there is a need for generalists in the education field. In this field some instructors use "big words" and try to out smart themselves with there own thoughts of character. Last, I will discuss how there is a need for generalists in the workplace. In the workplace the bosses should be open with personell. For instance, instead of acting like they know everything they should be open to knew thoughts and ideas.
COMMENTARY
On the surface, this essay appears to present an organized discussion of the issue. In actuality, there are fundamental deficiencies in analysis and development.
The essay begins with a tautology: "...there are many people who feel generalist are more broad than specialists." Then, in the three short paragraphs that follow, the writer promises to discuss "a need for generalists" in a specific field, but none of these discussions materialize.
The rest of the essay only confirms the sense of "fundamental deficiency." Rather than analyze the issue, the writer unpersuasively vilifies specialists as people who use their power to deceive and mislead others.
Although the errors (sentence fragments, incorrect verb tenses, and awkward syntax) are persistent, language problems alone do not earn this essay a score of "1." Rather, this response fits the scoring guide criterion of showing "little evidence of the ability to develop or organize a coherent response to the topic."
GRE写作满分范文
"It is unfortunate that today's educators place so much emphasis on finding out what students want to include in the curriculum and then giving it to them. It is the educators' duty to determine the curriculum and the students' duty to study what is presented to them."
In today's society, there is too much emphasis placed on students desires rather than their needs. The students of today should have to study what is presented to them, rather than what is desired by them. Students are searching for the easy way out, and educators' are supplying them with that. Students should not only be presented with mandatory curriculum, but the educators should strive to insure that each individual student truly gains from their education, rather than just breezing through it.
It is vital to the continued success and expansion of the United States, that the young people be challenged in their curriculum and be encouraged to succeed in all that they do. The educators should determine a more strenuous curriculum, and enforce it at an earlier age. Thus, the young people of today will expect to be challenged, rather than avoiding it. Students have the easy way out, and they are not truly giving all that they can. There is so much potential that is just waiting to flourish, but it is the educators' reponsibility to tap into that potential.
In conclusion, it is the educators responsibility to enforce curriculum and than raquesting it. Students should be challenged and expect curriculum that will eventually lead them to a path of success.
COMMENTARY
This brief essay is flawed by its generalities, repetition, and limited development. The central thesis -- that it is the burden of educators to teach what they believe is necessary and that our educational system should not allow students to "breeze through" the educational system -- is not adequately supported. The middle of the essay merely repeats much of what was said in the introduction. The writer discusses the concepts of students' potential and educators' responsibilities in only the most general terms.
The two-sentence conclusion simply repeats earlier discussion and does not sufficiently tie together and comment upon the earlier discussion. To earn a score of 4, this essay would need to provide specific reasons and examples that more adequately develop its main points.
Also, the phrasing is often vague ("giving all that they can" and "path of success"), and the syntax is at times poorly controlled ("young people of today will expect to be challenged, rather than avoiding it.") Still, the problems are not severe or frequent. For all of these reasons, this essay received a 3.
GRE写作相关文章：
